🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.